Karen
Craggs-Milne
Director of Gender Equality
Incorporated
Originally from
Kenya, Karen Craggs-Milne is the Director of Gender Equality
Incorporated, a Toronto-based organization that specialises in
promoting gender equality in Canadian and International
Development.
An accomplished gender
specialist, Karen has worked both internationally and in Canada
to promote equitable outcomes for women and men
over the last 10 years.
Her technical expertise
lies in gender training, gender-based
institutional and
program evaluations and audits, gender analysis and gender
mainstreaming.
Karen is a leading specialist in Gender Auditing in Canada. She
has conducted several Gender Audits for Canadian organizations
working in a number of different sectors and regions.
Karen has a BA in International Studies with a Certificate in
Refugee and Migration Studies from York University, Toronto,
Canada. She also holds an MSc in International Development
Management from the London School of Economics, (LSE), UK.
For information
on her
training
courses
visit www.genderequality.ca
CLW's Interview with Karen Craggs-Milne
How do you define gender as opposed to
biological sex?
Sex refers to physical sexual characteristics that define an
individual as a woman, girl, man, boy, intersex or
hermaphrodite.
Gender refers to the social attributes / characteristics
associated with being a woman, girl, man, boy or transgender
person in a given social context.
In most cases sex is seen as fixed, while
gender is seen as re-definable and changeable. This means that
working towards change and gender equality requires working on
gender.
For example, while women have to give birth, why is it that this
role is extended long after birth so that when the child is not
well in day care it is often the mother who is expected to take
time of work to take the child to the doctor even though a
father could do this just as easily?
There have been a number of different approaches to addressing
the status of women, which approach do you advocate and why?
Put simply, there are three different approaches to addressing
the status of women.
Firstly, working with women to promote the status of women
(through equity initiatives)
Secondly, working with both women and men to promote the status
of women (through gender integration and gender mainstreaming
initiatives).
Thirdly, working with men to promote the status of women
(through initiatives such as the White Ribbon Campaign.
Based on Gender Equality Incorporated’s (GEI) work over
the last 10 years we have found that the most effective approach
to addressing the status of women in any given situation is a
combination of all three approaches. The specific context helps
to determine the most appropriate combination of these
approaches.
What
do you do when you conduct a gender analysis in an organisation?
GEI uses Gender Audit tools to examine an
organization’s overall gender related performance. A Gender
Audit is a comprehensive, participatory methodology that
examines cross-organizational performance (internal) as well as
cross-program performance (external). For more details on Gender
Audit methodology, please visit our website –
www.genderequality.ca
Is the presumption that men and women do
things differently biased in that the sexes are socialized to
behave in certain ways?
Is gender identity a result of nature or nurture? I say both!
While we may be hard-wired through genetics and biology, much of
who we become as individuals is a result of socialization –
conscious and unconscious conditioning.
Is the goal of gender equality to ensure that women and men ‘do
things the same way?’ I don’t think so! There is nothing wrong
in men and women doing things differently. In fact, I would
argue that this is a strength – if we all approached problems
with the same perspective and set of skills, the world would be
very uni-dimensional!
GEI advocates for the need to recognize
and value gender-based differences in ways of doing and being.
We also encourage individuals,
communities, organizations to recognize that gender identity and
gender roles are fluid along a continuum.
How do you define equality and equity? Which objective do you
encourage organizations / communities to work towards?
Stated simply, equality is an end result
(a state of being), equity is a process to achieving that result
(a way of doing). Equality refers to having equal opportunities
whereas equity refers to the conscious measures that are put
into place to address historical, systemic
or gender-based barriers.
Equality is often associated with equal treatment, however,
equal treatment of different groups (in this case women and men)
tends to lead to unequal outcomes, and therefore, further
inequality.
I would strongly encourage organizations to strive for equitable
opportunities and equitable outcomes. This means that
organizations need to recognize that women and men are different
and that they have different gender roles, identities,
priorities and needs.
The most gender responsive organizations not only recognize but
also strive to ensure that these differences are valued equally
and reflected in the organization’s structure, policies and
practices.
Can you discuss the types of changes you achieved in a
particular organisation as a result of your work on gender
issues?
GEI has a very strong track record in facilitating substantive
and measurable changes in organizations striving to promote
gender equality across their organizations.
In 2006 we worked with Oxfam Canada to
conduct an in-depth Gender Audit which assisted the organization
to set about transforming not only their programming but also
internal structures, culture and practices to be more inclusive
and respectful of women and men in all their diversity. The
results and recommendations outlined in the report below give
you a concrete sense of the depth and breadth of changes that
have were facilitated
as
a result of our work with Oxfam Canada.
http://www.oxfam.ca/news-and-publications/publications-and-reports/walking-the-talk-on-women2019s-rights-summary-report-of-the-oxfam-canada-gender-audit/?searchterm=gender%20audit
What are some gender mainstreaming processes which you advocate
for organisational leaders to use? How do you, for example,
institute gender equity in retention policies in workplaces?
Mainstreaming gender means integrating gender considerations
systematically across organizational policies, structures,
culture and practices.
In day-to-day terms this means asking how does this area of work
affect women and men differently? What sex-specific or gender
related issues / considerations do we need to take into account
to ensure that we are reflective and inclusive of women and
men’s differences; what barriers or constraints do we need to
address for women and men to ensure equitable access or control
over workplace resources, benefits and decision-making? Would
our work and the way we do it be different if we were being
inclusive of the differences between women and men?
Based on the model provided by the Commission for the
Advancement of Women (CAW), successful gender mainstreaming
requires investment in political will, technical capacity,
accountability mechanisms and organizational culture. GEI works
with individual clients to determine what is already in place in
each of these areas, what the gaps are and how to move forward
in a coherent and strategic manner to ensure sustainable change.
How is gender work different from diversity initiatives which
also aim to include marginalised groups such as women?
Gender is one of the many facets of diversity.
Gender work tends to focus specifically on power differences
between the sexes and the impacts of sex-based and / or
gender-based discrimination.
The tools and methods used to address gender issues are easily
adaptable and can be used to identify and address other
diversity issues.
Diversity initiatives can help to map multiple forms of
discrimination (including gender based discrimination) and can
contribute to a fuller understanding of the complexities of
gender relations in a specific context.
Both gender and diversity tools and lenses should be used to
complement each other.
When working in this area in a developing country, how do you
tackle inequitable differences between men and women
acknowledging that they are rooted in the culture and are not
western values?
I start with the recognition that gender equality looks
different in different contexts.
For example, in urban Canada, gender equality is often described
in terms of women having equal access to income, employment
opportunities and decision-making roles that are traditionally
or generally perceived as being held by men.
However, in a project I worked on in rural
Brazil, gender equality was described by women and men villagers
as having the ability and means to fulfill traditional roles
(women cooking and looking after children and men fishing,
providing food and income) with the specific goal of families
and communities
stayed intact.
In some cases I have found that inequitable differences are a
result of unconscious gender-bias and that once community
members have an opportunity to examine their unconscious
beliefs, attitudes and practices through a gender lens, they are
very often willing to realign themselves to be more ‘equitable’.
In other case I have found that
challenging inequitable differences among women and men are
maintained intentionally and that there is conscious resistance
to addressing this inequality. This is often a more delicate
situation and the key strategy in this case is to determine
the most constructive strategy
keeping in mind that we don’t want to cause a backlash or
undermine any opportunities for change in the longer term.
What suggestions do you have for those interested in developing
their sensitivity to gender in the workplace?
GEI provides sensitivity training to many of individuals – so
far mostly men – who have been mandated by the Ontario Human
Rights Commission to undergo sensitivity training as a result of
gender-based discrimination in the workplace.
Below are a few of the key take-away tips and strategies that we
provide to clients in our training:
Gender sensitivity in the workplace means
recognizing that:
1.
Women and men work differently – value different ways of working
and focus on achieving the results as opposed to how those
results will be achieved.
2.
Women and men have different gender roles
– identify more flexible work arrangements to reasonably
accommodate gender-based responsibilities and duties
3.
Women and men communicate differently - practice active
listening and effective communication skills
4.
Women and men deal with conflict
differently – develop effective conflict resolution skills
5.
Women and men bring unique, often complementary strengths –
invest in team-building and help create a team focused on
win-win results as opposed to focusing on maintaining status quo
within the team groups.
|