
Interview with Eva Cox
|
Do you believe in climate change? Why or why not?
I do
believe in human contribution to climate change because there is
evidence enough that we are producing toxic excesses. We
need to adopt the precautionary principle, not absolute proof
because it is sensible to look at high probabilities and act on
them.
In light of international gender inequalities such as food
security, poverty, levels of household work and access to
decision-making prevailing, what do you think needs to be done
before climate change intensifies these existing inequalities?
I have
said for many years that people will not commit to better ways
of dealing with environmental issues unless we fix our social
relationships. If we frighten people who are already socially
disconnected, people will not act collectively for the common
good. So we need to put some social equity goals before
environmental ones, eg fairness and equity. Then people are more
likely to adopt difficult changes that may require some limits
to growth.
How do you regard the usefulness of the village or local
approach in creating localised sustainable environments to deal
with climate change? Do you think that women need to
direct their efforts into a community led, localised approach
more so than a regional or international one?
Women need
to be involved and operate at all levels. If we focus on the
local, those at higher levels will undermine and destroy the
local as power is usually downwards. So we need to make sure we
are heard and involved at all levels.
In relation to the social impacts of climate change such as
stress, welfare and decline of community relationships, how can
women of different backgrounds and communities mitigate and plan
for the impacts of climate change?
Am not
sure why backgrounds are the issue, we need to work together and
to do so, we need to act on the issues that divide us, including
fear and the self interest that often is the result of fear.
In the absence of a gender perspective in the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change indicating that climate change has differential impacts on societies varying among regions, generations, ages, classes, income groups, occupations and gender lines,
a)How can women's voices be heard and included in decision
making in global policies on climate change?
We need to
raise our game and make sure we are there. Women's groups are
too likely to avoid unfamiliar areas and stay out of the
battles, so we need to up our game.
What do you find to be most significant about current research
findings that relates to examining the differential social
impacts of climate change? Are there any examples where
policy is proving to be successful in empowering people and
building their adaptive capacities?
Am not
familiar with this literature, what works more generally is
genuine devolution of decision making and control.
If you were to
develop a socially responsive climate change policy for
Fairness
and deliberate engagement of all significant groups.
What is your opinion of there being a lack of bipartisan support
in Australia for the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS),
the cap-and-trade emissions trading scheme (ETS) which was
rejected in the Parliament in August and December 2009?
How would you like the Gillard Government to move forward on
this issue?
By getting
some guts and not constantly compromising with the powerful
Return to Expert Panel on Climate Change
|